Is Sanju Samson Kerala’s greatest athlete?
If you look at medals tally or longevity, the answer is a clear NO. Sanju Samson may not be Kerala’s gretest athelete but he is clearly the one who embodies the Malayali psyche to the hilt. In a cinematic parallel, Sanju is like Mohanlal the superstar of Malayalam cinema. Both put out performances that feel effortless. Both eschew exaggerated gestures and overt theatrics when a simple smile will do. Sanju often seems to glide through the innings. His shots are not loud declarations of power but elegant expressions of timing. The ball races to the boundary before the crowd fully registers what happened. There is grace in the way the bat comes down, a smoothness that makes even difficult strokes appear routine.
Kerala’s cultural psyche tends to admire mastery that appears natural rather than manufactured. The hero who tries too hard rarely wins lasting affection. The one who makes excellence look easy becomes a legend. Mohanlal built a decades-long career on that principle. Sanju seems to embody the same philosophy on the cricket field.
When Mohanlal burst onto the scene in the early 1980s, he did not look like a conventional hero. He brought a quality of naturalism in his early performances in Bharatham and Kireedam. Sanju in his ealry IPL days played the cover drive, the pick-up over midwicket with effortless timing that looked like instinctive shots.
For Mohanlal, the 1990s and early 2000s were a period of expansion. He experimented with mass roles, comedy, intense drama and commercial cinema. Films like Spadikam proved he could also dominate the screen with swagger when required. Similarly, Sanju spent years searching for his exact place in Indian cricket. Was he an opener or a middle-order batter? A wicketkeeper-batsman or a pure stroke maker? A prodigy or a finished star? Like Mohanlal experimenting with genres, Samson’s career moved through phases of promise, inconsistency and rediscovery.
With time, Mohanlal evolved into something more profound than a star. In films like Drishyam, he plays an ordinary man whose intelligence unfolds quietly over the course of the story. Samson today appears to be entering a similar stage in cricket. The strokes remain elegant, but the temperament has deepened. The innings are now constructed rather than improvised.
Changing tracks, if Sanju is Mohanlal, who was Sreesanth? Did he not embody the Malayali psyche. The man who could give the Badshah of Bollywood, Shahrukh Khan a run for his money when it came to dance moves, was the other side of the Malayali ethos. If Sanju is all about controlled aggression, Sreesanth was about unfiletered emotional combusiton. In a state that is hundred per cent literate, people do not feel the need to oversell themselves; they would rather achieve success with their work ethic.
Sreesanth appealed loudly, celebrated fiercely, fought visibly with the moment, and carried his nerves on his sleeve. People describe him as exuberant, emotional, passionate, and controversial. He was not the polished Malayali hero. And Kerala understands that person too because it is a culture that also admires intensity, wounded pride, defiance and theatrical moral force. Suresh Gopi’s iconic 1990s image was built on fiery monologues, raw intensity, and command presence in films like Commissioner. Sreesanth brought that same voltage into cricket.
So if Sanju Samson is Mohanlal and Sreesanth is Suresh Gopi, who is Mammukka, are you asking? If Mohanlal represents effortless naturalism and Suresh Gopi represents explosive intensity, then Mammootty represents a third Malayali archetype; that of the disciplined patriarch. Aaron George – are you there?
For More Exciting Articles: Follow RevSportz
The post Is Sanju Samson Kerala’s greatest athlete? appeared first on Sports News Portal | Revsportz.
Comments
Post a Comment